Dear Folks, 11 September 2011
Well, whose mind is in the gutter? I just sat down at the computer upstairs, a Toshiba laptopper which has Korean fonts and a Korean operating system. We can use it to connect with our bank accounts in South Korea. My oldest son had been up here using the computer. I glanced at the title of the website he had in the front open browser, duplicated for the comfort of my dear reader below:
Perhaps you see this at a glance, just as I saw it. My mind was immediately concerned, reading "Dog Fart Breeding Questions." So then, again I ask, "Who's mind was in the gutter?"
I should face it; I have good kids. They have good manners in public. I feel blessed to have spent so much time with them. Too, I believe any child, with adequate loving attention will be what we generally think of as "a good kid." By no means does that ensure his ticket to heaven.
For the record, here are the other sites my son had open in his browsers:
In my Sunday School class today, our teacher, Steve, said that our church, Faith Baptist Church, is better understood as "a hospital for sinners than a hotel for saints." I like that very much. Jesus said he came to heal the sick, that the righteous had no need of him. But then, you have to ask, who is truly righteous? Answer: Nobody. We have all fallen short of the glory of God, in our sin.
My wife is playing the piano now. She has been playing for over an hour, while I cleaned the dishes, schlepped out the trash and compostables, and before that, cut little David's hair as he slept.
I can't wait until I can take Hebrew. I do not know when that will happen, but it seems now that it may come to pass. I was in danger there for a week or two, as my wife seemed determined to buy a couple of small homes (3 bedroomers) and rent them out for a bit of income here. We do not work. I have worked all my life in one capacity or another. So truly, I work now. However, as I age, I have revised my perception of work. Of course I never want to retire. Any healthy sincere Christian should never desire retirement.
Update: 18th September 2011
Public Services in Social Welfare:
I met a woman named Cheryl today at church. We talked for nearly an hour after Sunday School. It did not seem like an hour, but our Sunday school class gets out at 9:15, and it was 10:34 when I drove out of there. She deplored the state of our welfare system today, noting that the system should be primarily for older people, those who are unable to fend for themselves properly. I assume she would also include the truly handicapped. Anytime you forcefully expropriate property from citizens in the way we tax, and then seek to dole it out, you are going to have to make rules for limitations.
I told her that I believed the fault of such a system lies in those who advocate and/or vote for it. If we want, we can vote solely for a system which benefits the elderly and handicapped. I believe that you cannot fault individuals for accepting money to which they are legally entitled. I agree that developing a state wherein we foster "entitlement thinking" is wrong. However, the Bible is clear that Christians must submit to the governing authorities (Romans 13), and I believe the submission includes a corresponding right for the Christian citizen to avail himself of every legal benefit for which he qualifies so long as he that service is Biblically sound.
If you can show that accepting the services of public schooling or public welfare, then we should not be receiving those. Currently, I believe that it is immoral for one to advocate public schooling, and as well to vote for the expansion or maintenance of such.
Generally, that which is legal stands a much better chance of being morally acceptable, at least if you focus on the Ten Commandments, and their narrow proscriptions. I believe it is morally acceptable for parents to allow their children to be educated in the public schools if they so desire -- not only for the undeniable asymmetrical power relationship between the individual and the state. I feel the same way for public welfare.
Regarding the source of funds, I can see no qualitative difference between the public school system and the public welfare system. Both have the government as the primary provider, moving in to occupy a huge portion of the whole industry, skewing costs and quality standards, greatly impairing the ability of the private providers to compete fairly and to use their own standards of value to decide how, when, for whom, and where to provide the services. This diminishes their capacity to behave as responsible moral agents over the resources they "own." In fact, such deprivation of control marks a diminution of ownership. Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production.
Free Services and Their Value in My Life:
I have been tossing about a theme in my pumpkin head for the better part of a decade. I have come to acknowledge that the greatest value I render society is not necessarily that which flows from my paid labor, or other normal economic activity, such as my passive income from stocks or savings and thus and such. Hence, I have become ever more comfortable with the consideration of a future wherein I engage the world far less, as a percentage of my time, with paid labor and the paid use of my capital (bank interest, et cetera).
To wit, I let a fairly big chunk of my money sit in a South Korean bank at zero interest, when 4.5% was available, merely because I did not concern myself with eeking out every bit of income that I could from that source. In the process, I "Lost" several thousand dollars, but felt that fine in that I was able to focus my mind on other, unpaid, concerns in society and within my family (which is verily a subset of society). The online command to switch the funds from a zero-interest account to several one and three-month CD's would have taken probably an hour or so. My lack of concern with this "opportunity cost" is an excellent example of the increasing value I have come to place on my time as devoted to other, non-paid concerns.
I only wish that I had focused more fully on volunteer work and other careers which garner less pay earlier in my life, and I heartily encourage other, younger Christians to do so. One thing is sure: generally, the less time you spend chasing a paycheck in the U.S., the more social welfare you will be qualified to receive, and the more time you will have to devote to areas which you deem God highly values, teaching the Word, sharing communion with other Christians, and thus and such. Granted, this requires a greater degree of confidence and reliance upon God to provide for your needs, but God will come through. He clearly has for me when and wherever I elected to make myself more vulnerable and needy. Praise the Lord!
To be sure savings and stock ownership are valuable services inasmuch as bank savings clearly lower the cost of borrowing by increasing the supply ... and for stock, the greater demand to own stock supports prices, while ownership of stock supports the production of goods and services in the society, without which we would be hard put for goods and services upon which we all depend, diapers, desks, dictionaries, and thus and such.
I notice that my smiles and joy to others foments greater joy in the commons. I also notice that my life of not working for labor, which began rather recently, with our move to the U.S., has been quite valuable to society in my judgment, certainly not less than was my work prior to this. Merely raising children well is a valuable asset to society, and not only in producing future tax payers who should be ready and fain to pay back all the money we have allocated to our American European-Styled Welfare State (Hereafter AESWS).
I remember reading an article about the changes in Russian society after the moved from socialism to a free market economy, long about 1990, as it were. The article seemed to focus on representing the educated class, professors and intellectuals. Quotes had people lamenting the loss of time they had for long dinners with friends, drinking vodka, eating good food and much talk. Sincere adult discussion has much value, even if people are not always willing to pay for the full value of it.
The best single indicator of value a person contributes to society through his work (certainly his paid work) is perhaps the money voluntarily given in exchange for the products and services his efforts generate (as in a paycheck, or gross revenues of a business he owns), and this figure would be an even better estimate if one could remove the demand dampening effects of taxes on such products or services.
Had he grown up in Germany or France (which have much higher rates of government consumption relative to GDP) Bill Gates would scarcely have produced so much with Microsoft (if he even were to have toyed with the idea of giving his attention to founding such a company, and dropping out of Harvard). More likely, in these more thorough social democracies Bill would have merely remained in his college to finish a degree, deeming that proven route the best means of surely providing well for his future family. And who could really blame him?